USA:Identifying Outputs of Generative Adversarial Networks Act (IOGAN Act)

1.Overview

Identifying Outputs of Generative Adversarial Networks Act is a 2020 Act in the United States of America which focuses on increasing research efforts that help to detect and verify information deepfakes and AI-generated content. The Act mandates NSF and NIST to assist in the research of understanding authenticity and the manipulation of content and information, deepfakes among other things.

2. Coverage of the Legislation

The scope of the IOGAN Act specializes in subsidizing the study of detection and verification of content, especially that produced by GANs (Generative Adversarial Networks), including deepfakes. The Act does not make it unlawful to create or circulate deepfakes; instead, it focuses on developing mechanisms and criteria for detecting such content. Also, the Act has no specific provisions excluding satire, journalism, or AI research because that would align with its intent to streamline research initiatives.

3. Key Provisions

• Prohibited Acts: There are no specified prohibited acts listed under the IOGAN Act, however, federal bodies have a duty to encourage the manipulation of synthetic material or its detection through the research mechanisms provided.
• Consent Requirements: The Act does not specify any consent requirements regarding the creation or distribution of deepfakes.
• Platform Responsibilities: The IOGAN Act does not create any specific platform responsibilities, although such research may inform other future guidelines or standards set by the Platforms.

4. Penalties and Enforcement

The IOGAN Act has no stipulated penalties or enforcement measures because it is primarily concerned with supporting research. The NSF and NIST have the responsibility of carrying out the research orders provided in the Act.

5. Important Legal Cases Or Precedents

As there are no IOGAN Act oriented research cases supporting primary legislation to aid in its execution, no important legal cases or precedents have been recorded related to the Act.

6. Comparison with International Standards

The other global laws concerning deepfake content are much more restrictive than the IOGAN Act, which takes a more neutral approach by offering tools and standards for detection instead of outright content prohibitions.

7. Practical Implications

There are no direct requirements for acts in the law in question, for the creators and platforms, but rather the provided research will offer proper tools and standards to define guiding principles for regulating deepfakes in the future.

8. Future Outlook

Through fostering research that focuses on deepfake detection and authentication, the IOGAN Act lays down preliminary steps for future legislation. The evolution of technology will, in turn, allow for these policies to define more specific provisions for controlling the creation and distribution of AI-generated content.