• Home
  • Press Release
17 Sep 2025

Try Now

Get 10 FREE credits by signing up on our portal today.

Sign Up

China:Provisions on the Administration of Deep Synthesis of Internet Information Services

Author: admin | 17 Sep 2025

1. Overview

China’s provisions on the Administration of Deep Synthesis of Internet Information Services, which was passed and enforced in January 2023 by the Cyberspace Administration, are aimed at controlling the application of AI-created content (deepfakes), and stopping their misuse to spreading fraud, false information, and other negative acts.

2. Scope of the Law

This regulation includes the emergence of  and dissemination of “deep synthesis” materials ,that is media produced through deep-learning  technologies to manipulate or create biometric evidence ,including expressions, voices , or faces.It responds to fraud, covers impersonation ,and non-consensual deepfakes.The law exempts scientific studies and materials  are objectively marked and not misleading.

3.Key Provisions

  • Prohibited Acts:It is unlawful to distribute  or  create deep synthesis contents that transform information in a way that creates reasonable doubt in the perception of the  public,particularly if it is politically sensitive.
  • Consent Requirements:concerning biometric information of persons being used for synthesizing content ,there ought to be prior consent from people concerned.
  • Platform Responsibilities:Internet platforms should have capabilities  to identify and block the dissemination  of toxic synthesis content ,have a user reporting mechanism in place ,and  carry out timely removal of illegal content.

4.Penalties and Enforcement

Offenses can result in administrative penalties,blacklisting,or fines for services.The Cyberspace Administration of China(CAC) will be responsible for enforcement with the  coordination of other legal agencies and public security.

5.Notable Cases or Precedents 

Though no particular public court cases have been held,enforcement measures have taken the form of content removals and warnings made during elections to counteract misinformation.

6.Comparison to Global Standards

Compared to the EU AI Act and U.S. state-level legislation, China’s provisions are more centralized and proactive, emphasizing necessary marking and real-time platform intervention.

7.Practical Implications 

Content creators are required to disclose synthesis content transparently and obtain consent.Offenders can be reported by victims to the CAC.Escape from the sanctions platforms requires compliance tools and an effective takedown process.

8.Future Outlook 

China can bring in criminal sanctions for chronic or serious offenses and extend the law to incorporate real-time voice synthesis abuse and  impersonation .